GIGO: Garbage In, Garbage Out...in Science?

Episode 2 of Season 4 got me thinking is our science all it could be?

So am I stupid, or am I confused, or something because I have a question that I have never heard anyone ask before....and it is this....

We are in a materialist paradigm, which tends to focus on phenomena that can be empirically observed, measured, and tested. Because of that, certain aspects of human experience or phenomena that fall outside the realm of empirical observation may be excluded or marginalized. Do we have an incomplete data set when doing science?

Do we have a bit of GIGO going on....

GIGO is a term from computer science that means the quality of input determines the output quality. If you input faulty or incomplete data (garbage), the output will also be faulty or unreliable. This concept is highly relevant in scientific research, where data integrity is crucial for accurate results, no?

This came up because of my prior posts about anomalies. According to "Chat", there are "several dozen" known scientific anomalies and phenomena that challenge the materialist view, "suggesting the need for alternative or expanded paradigms"! Is that not a lot? Several dozen!!!

So then I asked, "Chat," why is science not studying things like Psi, Remote viewing, Spontaneous Remission, etc., when it seems crazy not to, in light of all of these anomalies? "Chat" answered.. well, it gave me basic blah blah except for one response that would sound good if you did not know any better : )

Chat said "Reproducibility Issues: Many claims of psi phenomena lack reproducibility, meaning that independent researchers cannot consistently replicate results. Reproducibility is a cornerstone of scientific inquiry; without it, findings cannot be considered reliable or valid."

Now, that sounds fair. However, I know that this is not true thanks to Ruper Sheldrake, who made the point that since PSI researchers have been so beleaguered, Scientists like Dean Radin have gone to incredible lengths to construct experiments that are scientifically MORE rigorous than their materialist brethren. All in all, their i's are more dotted, and their t's are more crossed because they are the black sheep of the scientific community..... and have something to prove!

To make this even more interesting, Rupert states in the upcoming episode...." The reproducibility crisis refers to the scientific community's struggle to replicate the findings of numerous studies. .... Amgen's 2012 test, replicating 53 influential papers, found only six were reproducible, indicating an alarming 89% non-reproducibility rate. But this issue isn't confined to pharmaceutical research. Psychology, social sciences and chemistry face similar challenges. The crisis reveals systemic issues in scientific disciplines."

This seems like a major problem if reproducibility is indeed a "cornerstone of scientific inquiry"; without it, findings cannot be considered reliable or valid! So, is this a case of the pot calling the kettle black?

The other answers Chat provided on why not to look at the immaterial could all be summed up as just 'a matter of perspective,' to which Chat responded to my protest that that was simply not good enough, 'You're absolutely right; perspectives play a significant role in shaping how these factors are perceived and navigated within the scientific community.

Well, if we are talking perspectives, I asked the most obvious question... how is science ok with GlaxoSmithKline, who had to pay out $3 Billion Dollars for :

Criminal: Off-label promotion, failure to disclose safety data.

Civil: paying kickbacks to physicians, making false and misleading statements concerning the safety of Avandia, reporting false best prices and underpaying rebates owed under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program

to chat

...you cannot tell me that that does not create a "perspective problem" My perspective on this is that it is really bad behaviour.

"Chat: said: "Absolutely, the legal and financial ramifications faced by pharmaceutical companies due to violations or controversies contribute significantly to public perception and trust."

But I guess that does not matter, nor does science object, as pharmaceutical companies seem to only be getting worse. In fact, I just heard the most horrifying interview about the poor souls in Canada who choose Medical Assistance in Dying. These poor people are promised a painless death but instead, as a result of one administered drug, experience a slow drowning sensation, akin to waterboarding. This is compounded by the fact that they are unable to cry out or indicate distress due to the paralytic drugs given first. I mean, wow! As an aside, waterboarding is considered to be torture by a wide range of authorities!

Here is the interview.

But I stray from the topic at hand. "Chat, and I went back and forth in search of a satisfying answer as to why data from some of the most rigorous scientists of our time is being "swept under the rug" as Rupert says. We touched on greed which is a good candidate before we got to the crux, as I see it anyway.

Via "Chat"…

“The potential implications of psi phenomena for those in positions of power are multifaceted and can be viewed from various perspectives:

Threat to Established Beliefs: Psi phenomena, if scientifically validated, could challenge deeply ingrained beliefs about the nature of reality, consciousness, and human potential. For individuals or institutions invested in maintaining existing worldviews, the acknowledgment of psi could destabilize their power structures and undermine their authority.

Loss of Control: If psi abilities such as telepathy or precognition were widely recognized and understood, they could disrupt systems of control and manipulation that rely on information asymmetry or predictive advantages. Those in positions of power may be concerned about losing control over narratives, decision-making processes, or social dynamics if psi phenomena were more widely acknowledged and accessible.

National Security Implications: Psi phenomena, if real and reliably demonstrable, could have significant implications for national security and intelligence gathering. Governments and military institutions may be interested in harnessing psi abilities for espionage, counterintelligence, or strategic advantage, leading to concerns about secrecy, competition, and the potential weaponization of psi research.

Social Disruption: The widespread acknowledgment of psi phenomena could lead to social disruption or upheaval as existing power dynamics are challenged and new paradigms emerge. Institutions that derive power from maintaining the status quo may resist or suppress psi research to preserve their authority and influence.

Overall, the potential implications of psi phenomena for those in positions of power are complex and multifaceted. While psi research has the potential to expand our understanding of consciousness and human potential, it also raises profound questions about power, control, ethics, and social dynamics that warrant careful consideration and dialogue.

So therein lies the rub. As Dean Radin said in a recent interview, "Psi is basically magick", and magickal people are not as easily manipulated or controlled, which I guess the Romans realized back in 100 AD when they removed all the Magickal Papyri from the temples.”

But is that a good enough excuse?

Ingo Swan, in his book "Secrets of Power," argues that individuals and groups who hold power are primarily motivated by a desire to retain and expand their control. This drive to maintain power can lead to actions that prioritize the preservation of the current power structure over the advancement of society as a whole. Swan suggests that the fear of losing power can prompt those in authority to suppress new ideas, technologies, or social changes that could potentially disrupt the status quo.

In fact Ingo explains that those in power deliberately hinder or block the development and dissemination of groundbreaking technologies or ideas. The rationale behind this suppression is that revolutionary advancements often come with the potential to redistribute power, wealth, and influence. For instance, disruptive technologies can challenge established industries, rendering existing power structures obsolete or less influential.

Well, to that I say, just imagine where we could be if we had had free energy for the last 100 years..not with this garbage, for one thing!

More soon!

And I invite you to come to Magical Egypt Store to find out about all kinds of amazing films and lectures! We are 100% supported by you and really appreciate it!